Cases 1 - 10 of 204
Moorer v. State Of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00200
Petitioner:
Corey K. Moorer
Respondent:
State Of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eldridge v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Donny Eldridge
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berger v. 22nd State Bank et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
The State of Alabama
Not Yet Classified:
Kenneth Berger
Defendant:
22nd State Bank, Christopher Watkins, FEB Bancshares Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Alabama v. Scully
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Berger and State of Alabama
Defendant:
Defacto Judge William E. Scully, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berger v. State Of Alabama et al
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Berger
Defendant:
State Of Alabama, FEB Bancshares, Inc., 22nd State Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Linker v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Linker Christopher Ryan and Christopher Ryan Linker
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berger v. Skully et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Berger
Defendant:
William E. Skully, Jr, J. Dean, Michele M. Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCreary v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Roger Lee McCreary
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boone v. Mack
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
George Boone, Jr.
Respondent:
State Of Alabama and Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Norton v. State of Alabama
as 1:2023cv00448
Petitioner:
Thomas Norton
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
