Cases 81 - 90 of 104
Warren v. Standly et al
as 4:2011cv00254
Plaintiff:
Calvin Warren
Defendant:
Carolin Standly, Jessie Jackson, Sr, Jessie Jackson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Warren v. Warren et al
as 4:2011cv00243
Plaintiff:
Calvin Warren
Defendant:
John Warren, Jr, Fready Mae Warren, Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Jackson et al
as 4:2011cv00216
Plaintiff:
David Tyron Jones
Defendant:
Elliott Jackson and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Dollarway High School et al
as 5:2011cv00017
Plaintiff:
Dorothy A Thomas
Defendant:
Dollarway High School, Derrick Price, Earnest Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McKinley v. St Francis County, Arkansas et al
as 2:2010cv00181
Plaintiff:
Kelly McKinley
Defendant:
St Francis County, Arkansas, Gary Hughes, Bobby May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Posluns v. Education Management Corporation LLC et al
as 4:2010cv01294
Plaintiff:
Ronald J Posluns
Defendant:
Education Management Corporation LLC , Argosy Education Group, Inc , Argosy University and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. White County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2010cv00529
Plaintiff:
Marlyn Haynes
Defendant:
White County, Arkansas, Ricky Shourd, Davie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Billingsley
as 1:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
Terry Jones
Defendant:
Barbara Billingsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Crittenden County Jail et al
as 4:2010cv00040
Plaintiff:
David Jones
Defendant:
Arkansas State Hospital, Molden and Crittenden County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones-Manes v. Barnett et al
as 1:2010cv00003
Plaintiff:
Becky Lynn Jones-Manes
Defendant:
Bob Barnett, Keith Bowers and Independence County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
