Cases 101 - 110 of 10,253
Miller v. Turnkey Health
as 4:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Miller
Defendant:
Turnkey Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shorty v. Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility et al
as 4:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Shorty, Jr
Defendant:
Pulaski County Regional Detention Center, Department of Human Services and Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maget v. Richard et al
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Abbagayle Marie Maget and Kevin Lee Maget
Defendant:
Richard, Brush-Strode, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chenault v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
James C Chenault
Defendant:
S Williams and Pritcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Randle et al
as 4:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Ellis
Defendant:
Kenyon Randle and Does Lieutenant, E.A.R.U. Max; Mental Health Doctor, Central Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Brian Stephens
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Gibson
as 4:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Wood
Defendant:
James Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Arkansas Division of Correction et al
as 4:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Allen
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Correction, WellPath, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Parsons et al
as 4:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Tiequail Brown
Defendant:
Parsons, Echels, Wade Gilliam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Robinson et al
as 4:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Jane Robinson, Lindsy Hill, Francis Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
