Cases 91 - 100 of 957
Rabah v. DoorDash Inc
as 3:2021cv00235
Plaintiff:
Aaron Rabah
Defendant:
DoorDash Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Francis v. Gamdan Services LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Taylor Francis
Defendant:
Gamdan Services LLC, Gamdan Fadah and Adnan Fadah
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hoover v. Razors Edge Pizza Incorporated
as 4:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hoover
Defendant:
Razors Edge Pizza Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Duke v. Poplar Grove Operations LLC
as 4:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Antonio Duke
Defendant:
Poplar Grove Operations LLC doing business as Green House Cottages of Poplar Grove
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fletcher v. Conway Behavioral Health LLC
as 4:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Natasha Fletcher
Defendant:
Conway Behavioral Health LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Margrave v. Rotech Healthcare Inc
as 4:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Johnson Margrave
Defendant:
Rotech Healthcare Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Does et al v. Helena-West Helena Arkansas, City of
as 2:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
John Does and Jane Does
Defendant:
Helena-West Helena Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Laster et al v. Taylor 4 Delivery Inc et al
as 4:2021cv01209
Plaintiff:
Andre Laster, Aaron Thomas and Tyrus Lamont Boone
Defendant:
Taylor 4 Delivery, Israel Taylor and Taylor 4 Delivery Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Martin v. Comfort Systems USA Arkansas Inc
as 4:2021cv01215
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Rossi Martin
Defendant:
Comfort Systems USA Arkansas Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jackson v. Prairie County, Arkansas
as 4:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Cayla Jackson
Defendant:
Prairie County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
