Cases 121 - 130 of 141
Jones v. Billingsley
as 1:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
Terry Jones
Defendant:
Barbara Billingsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Crittenden County Jail et al
as 4:2010cv00040
Plaintiff:
David Jones
Defendant:
Arkansas State Hospital, Molden and Crittenden County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones-Manes v. Barnett et al
as 1:2010cv00003
Plaintiff:
Becky Lynn Jones-Manes
Defendant:
Bob Barnett, Keith Bowers and Independence County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Windstream Communications Inc
as 4:2009cv00961
Plaintiff:
Princess Jones
Defendant:
Windstream Communications Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Massey v. Jones et al
as 4:2009cv00855
Plaintiff:
Samuel R Massey
Defendant:
Oscar E Jones, Tim Weaver, John Norman Harkey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Morse v. Vinson et al
as 3:2009cv00153
Plaintiff:
Eddie S Morse
Defendant:
Gary Vinson, Oscar E Jones, Tom Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Frye v. Blytheville Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2009cv00150
Plaintiff:
Earnest Frye
Defendant:
Blytheville Arkansas, City of, Barrett Harrison, Shirley Connealy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Crutchfield et al
as 4:2009cv00480
Plaintiff:
Patricia Jones
Defendant:
Charles N Crutchfield and Seigfried Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
