Cases 11 - 20 of 460
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Smith v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Steven R Smith
Defendant:
Arkanas, State of, Pulaski County Arkansas, Does John and Jane 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Williams v. Pulaski, County of et al
as 4:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Khakeem Marquis Williams
Defendant:
Pulaski, County of, Eric Higgins, Mark Swaggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Sinclair v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Dominique Sinclair
Defendant:
Anthony Tyrone Davis, Francis Washington, Scottish Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Moytoy v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Ian Baylee Moytoy
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Human Services, Richard Alan Lisemby, Paul Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Ragsdale v. Pate et al
as 4:2023cv00973
Plaintiff:
Mary Ragsdale
Defendant:
Mark A Pate, James Wyatt, White, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Scott v. Doe
as 4:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
