Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Piliego v. Dupuy et al
as 4:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Kayle J Piliego
Defendant:
John Dupuy, Will Macke, Taylor Nicholson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Watts v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Frank Watts, II
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Morris Thompson, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Henry v. Sims et al
as 4:2018cv00464
Plaintiff:
Ronald E Henry
Defendant:
Barry Sims and Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winchester v. 20th Judicial District Prosecutors Office et al
as 4:2017cv00504
Plaintiff:
Mark A Winchester, Sr
Defendant:
20th Judicial District Prosecutors Office and Cody Hiland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Roberson et al
as 1:2016cv00167
Plaintiff:
Tommy Dixon
Defendant:
Allen Roberson , William Baker , Harold Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Eli Lilly et al
as 4:2011cv00256
Plaintiff:
Alberta Rose Jones
Defendant:
Eli Lilly, John Wesley Hall , Jennifer Maher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simes v. Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission et al
as 4:2010cv01047
Plaintiff:
L T Simes, II
Defendant:
Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission, Leon N Jamison, John Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
Timothy W Brown
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Human Services, Kurt Knickrehm, John Selig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Griffen v. Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission et al
as 4:2007cv00642
Plaintiff:
Wendell L Griffen
Defendant:
Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission, David Stewart, Frank J Wills, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
