Cases 41 - 50 of 358
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henson v. Cash et al
as 4:2022cv01252
Plaintiff:
Kobie Joe Henson
Defendant:
Cash and Josh Lingo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Trump et al
as 4:2022cv01041
Plaintiff:
Joseph David Sanders and Does "Technology Energy & Communication", MO Attorney General; Cabot Police Chief/Director; Director of CIA
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Tiffany Bristow, Roy Bristow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrisett v. Milligan
as 3:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Kenny Joe Morrisett
Defendant:
Kenny Milligan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peoples v. Payne
as 4:2020cv01484
Defendant:
Joe Page, III and Dexter Payne
Plaintiff:
Quayvon Peoples
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. West et al
as 3:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Tony Joe Stevens
Defendant:
Zachary West and Mark Ballard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Hogg et al
as 4:2022cv00862
Plaintiff:
Gregory Michael Perry
Defendant:
Leonard Hogg, Amanda Rodgers, Chris Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv01012
Plaintiff:
Joe D Cox
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Arkansas Department of Human Services, UAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clendenig v. Does
as 4:2022cv01010
Plaintiff:
Joe Clendenig
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grissom v. Freyder et al
as 4:2022cv00874
Plaintiff:
Wesley E Grissom
Defendant:
Charlie Freyder, Joe Page and Dale Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
