Cases 1 - 10 of 152
Lee v. Huckabee et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee, Board of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Roberts et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Buchanan
Defendant:
Roberts, Bata, Thomas Hurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denson v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv00994
Plaintiff:
Michael Denson
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Jones, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shackleford v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Donald Shackleford
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Jones, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv00993
Plaintiff:
Cedric Armond Mitchell
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Jones, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv00992
Plaintiff:
Robert Howard
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Jones, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tackett v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
Charles Tackett
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Jones, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockwood v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
Stephen W Lockwood
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Jones, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv00988
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Taylor, Robert Howard, Cedric Armond Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Jones, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henson v. Turn Key Medical Services et al
as 4:2023cv00587
Plaintiff:
Douglas Duane Henson
Defendant:
Turn Key Medical Services, Parson, Jennifer Hallman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
