Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Williams v. Baptist Health et al
as 4:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
Victor Bernard Williams
Defendant:
Baptist Health, Douglas Weeks, Everett Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Garrison v. Revclaims LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00253
Plaintiff:
Sue Garrison
Defendant:
Revclaims LLC , Avectus Healthcare Solutions LLC , St Bernard's Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Whitley v. Baptist Health et al
as 4:2016cv00624
Plaintiff:
Brian Whitley
Defendant:
Baptist Health , Baptist Health Hospitals , Diamond Risk Insurance LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Hargett v. Revclaims LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
Tammy Hargett
Defendant:
Revclaims LLC , St Bernards Hospital Inc , St Bernards Community Hospital Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Moore v. Gregory et al
as 4:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Angela Moore
Defendant:
Jennifer Gregory and Baptist Health of Little Rock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson et al v. Baptist Health et al
as 4:2013cv00509
Plaintiff:
Judith Johnson and James Johnson
Defendant:
Baptist Health , Boston Scientific Corporation Inc and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disability Rights Center of Arkansas Inc v. Baptist Health
as 4:2013cv00103
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights Center of Arkansas Inc
Defendant:
Baptist Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
