Cases 1 - 10 of 485
Evans et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Janna D Evans and Daniel Evans
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Breach of Contract
Andrews v. Well Path et al
as 4:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Donald S Andrews, Jr
Defendant:
Well Path, Corrective Care Solutions, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowley v. Lemons et al
as 4:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Crowley
Defendant:
Lemons, Lee, Arce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lackie v. Dennis et al
as 4:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Richard Daniel Lackie
Defendant:
Dennis, John Putman and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levac v. Haney et al
as 4:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Daniel Levac
Defendant:
Sarah Haney, Travis Hill, Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levac v. Haney
as 4:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Daniel Levac
Defendant:
Sarah Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wilson v. Brothers et al
as 4:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wilson
Defendant:
Brain Brothers, Short Wilson, Nick Gault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Cotten et al
as 4:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Jerome Edward Washington
Defendant:
David P Cotten, Jason Mitchell, Jeffie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Swatzel et al
as 4:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Daniel Carr
Defendant:
A Swatzel and David Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bayler v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Kristin Lin Bayler
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Guy Henry and Thomas Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
