Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Porter v. Harmon et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Mark Porter
Defendant:
Zachery S Harmon, Thomas Hurst, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Childers v. Does et al
as 4:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Childers
Defendant:
Does Employed by Arkansas Division of Correction, Benny Magness, John Felts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Does
as 4:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Does Employed by Arkansas Division of Correction, Benny Magness, John Felts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
DeLarron Keith Washington
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Jimmy Coleman, IV, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Every Richardson
Defendant:
Lorenetta Smith, Sedrick Franklin, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. Lane et al
as 2:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Roderick D Maxwell
Defendant:
Stephan Lane, Tyrone Allison, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Geddings v. Criner et al
as 4:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Robert Geddings
Defendant:
Blake Criner, Arkansas Department of Correction and Todd Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBee v. Battle et al
as 4:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
Tatyana Lashelle McBee
Defendant:
Corwin Battle, John Rhone, Blake Eudy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jake Lynn Norwood
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Kenny Bolden, RD Williamson Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Garrett
as 2:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
De Mario Blake Griffin
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
