Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Lippe v. Stone Bank et al
as 3:2021cv03043
Defendant:
Stone Bank, Marvin Sutterfield, James Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lippe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Wooten v. City of Fayetteville, Arkansas et al
as 5:2021cv05076
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wooten
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Creamer v. Boone County, Arkansas et al
as 3:2021cv03024
Defendant:
Boone County, Arkansas, Jane and John Does 1-V, Jason Day and others
Plaintiff:
Christina Creamer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bearden v. Brown & Root Contractors et al
as 2:2019cv02140
Defendant:
BR Industrial Operations, LLC, John Does 1-2, Kellogg Brown & Root, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jodi Bearden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boston v. Major et al
as 6:2019cv06029
Plaintiff:
Steve Boston
Defendant:
Garland Co. Sheriff Mike McCormick, Joseph Bernard Major, Corporal Jeremy J. Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Dickson et al
as 6:2018cv06124
Defendant:
John Doe, 1-50, The Malvern City Police Department, The Hot Spring County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Daniel Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cohn v. City of Fayetteville, Arkansas et al
as 5:2018cv05131
Defendant:
Kermit Channell, II, John Does 1-20, Lisa Channell and others
Plaintiff:
Rico Tavarous Cohn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Carrol County, Arkansas et al
as 3:2018cv03069
Plaintiff:
Brennan Bradley
Defendant:
Carrol County, Arkansas, Robert Grudek, Donald E. Harlan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. Huntsville School District et al
as 5:2018cv05067
Plaintiff:
Jessica McKinney
Defendant:
Huntsville School District , Roxanne Enix and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Ervin et al
as 2:2017cv02136
Plaintiff:
Scott Michael Baker
Defendant:
Austin Ervin, Brandon Davis, FNU Bunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
