Cases 71 - 80 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv06039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Going v. Shores et al
as 2:2012cv02048
Plaintiff:
Shawn Robert Going
Defendant:
Dennis Shores, Wal-Mart Store, Alma Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2012cv03012
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Deborah Groom, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lemoine v. Miller County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2010cv04170
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Lemoine
Defendant:
Miller County, Arkansas, Roy J. McNatt, H L Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broussard et al v. Waldron School District et al
as 2:2010cv02106
Plaintiff:
Teresa Broussard and John Doe
Defendant:
Waldron School District, James Floyd, Alice McConnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe et al v. Hot Springs School District et al
as 6:2010cv06043
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Hot Springs School District, Joyce Craft, Bobbie Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Corzine v. Epley et al
as 3:2010cv03033
Plaintiff:
Mark Corzine
Defendant:
Alan D. Epley, Carroll County Sheriff, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2010cv03027
Plaintiff:
Timothy W Brown
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Human Services, Kurt Knickrehm, John Selig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2010cv03009
Plaintiff:
Howard Johnson
Defendant:
John Montgomery, Randy Weaver, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
