Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Virden et al v. Crawford County, Arkansas et al
as 2:2023cv02071
Plaintiff:
Rebecka Virden, Samantha Rowlett and Nina Prater
Defendant:
Crawford County, Arkansas, County Judge Chris Keith, Quorum Court Member Robert Kevin Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hinshaw v. Columbia County, AR
as 1:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Gerald Hinshaw
Defendant:
Columbia County, Arkansas, Leroy Martin, Jerry Maness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Gillespie
as 3:2022cv03022
Plaintiff:
Megan Micaila Martin
Defendant:
Cindy Gillespie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Logan v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corp et al
as 2:2020cv02088
Defendant:
Wesley W. Von Schack, Thomas P. Gibbons, J. P. Sellers and others
Plaintiff:
Glicenia C. Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raper et al v. City of Warren, AR et al
as 1:2018cv01073
Defendant:
Angela Marshall, Bryan Martin, Bruce Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Carrie D. Raper and James M. Raper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03089
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv04041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Franklin v. Martin et al
as 2:2016cv02011
Plaintiff:
Daniel Franklin
Defendant:
David Martin , Lisa Franklin and Van Buren, Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
