Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Hurlburt v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 6:2017cv06115
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hurlburt
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Liggett, Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Dickson
as 6:2017cv06085
Plaintiff:
Steve Armstrong
Defendant:
Heath Dickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Gulley et al
as 4:2017cv04063
Defendant:
Alberta Brandon, James Gulley, Michael Armstrong and others
Plaintiff:
State Farm Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Armstrong v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 4:2015cv04060
Plaintiff:
Veronica D. Armstrong
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Mendez v. Castrop et al
as 2:2015cv02057
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Mendez
Defendant:
Larry Castrop and Armstrong Tool, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allen et al v. Diversicare Leasing Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv01065
Plaintiff:
Roberta Allen , Brandi Anderson , Connie Anderson and others
Defendant:
Diversicare Leasing Corp. , Diversicare Management Services Co. , Advocat, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Armstrong v. Transplace International, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv05252
Plaintiff:
Frank D. Armstrong
Defendant:
Transplace International, Inc. and Transplace Texas, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Armstrong v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2012cv05090
Plaintiff:
Tricia Lea Armstrong
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Armstrong v. Southern Bancorp et al
as 6:2012cv06004
Plaintiff:
Ken Armstrong
Defendant:
Southern Bancorp and David Woolridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.