Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Weston v. Johnson et al
as 4:2020cv04077
Defendant:
Ms. Gayle Wolfberger, Ms. Evans, Janson Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Weston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodge v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2019cv01024
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Crystal Gayle Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lewis-Zubkin v. USA
as 3:2018cv03118
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Patricia Gayle Lewis-Zubkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Alfa Vision Corporation v. Garcia et al
as 5:2018cv05013
Plaintiff:
Alfa Vision Corporation
Defendant:
Jose Garcia, Kayla Marie Romero, Gayle Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amaral v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2017cv03073
Plaintiff:
Gayle L. Amaral
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Wooten et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 4:2013cv04094
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff:
Virginia Gayle Wooten , Tommy Redfearn , James Steven Redfearn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medina et al v. Arkansas Comets Futbol Club et al
as 5:2009cv05196
Plaintiff:
Nelson Medina and Vengeance Futebol Club
Defendant:
Arkansas Comets Futbol Club, Samir Haj, NWA Lightning Soccer Club and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Barnett v. Montgomery et al
as 4:2009cv04034
Plaintiff:
Gayle Barnett
Defendant:
Cherise Montgomery, Jorge Ortega, Jorge Ortega and others
Cross Claimant:
Cherise Montgomery, Terry Hill and Dart Transit Company
Cross Defendant:
Azteca Express, Azteca Express, Azteca Express and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Nenninger v. United States Forest Service et al
as 3:2007cv03028
Plaintiff:
Tony Nenninger
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, Mark Rey, Gayle Kimball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
