Cases 1 - 10 of 347
Latham v. McGuire
as 4:2024cv04040
Plaintiff:
Richard Latham
Defendant:
Kristal McGuire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hughes v. Richards et al
as 5:2024cv05069
Plaintiff:
Brian Ramon Hughes
Defendant:
Sergeant Marilyn Richards, Corporal Haynes, Corporal Caffey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
United States of America v. Johnson et al
as 5:2024mc00022
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard J Johnson
Garnishee:
Aramark Services, Inc. and Aramark Corporation
Neice v. City of Van Buren, Arkansas
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Richard William Neice
Defendant:
City of Van Buren, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Novatae Risk Group, LLC v. CRC Insurance Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv05046
Plaintiff:
Novatae Risk Group, LLC
Defendant:
CRC Insurance Services, Inc. and Richard Dan Fouts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Rothmeyer v. Buchanon et al
as 4:2024cv04011
Plaintiff:
Jeremia Lin Rothmeyer
Defendant:
Mickey Buchanon and Richard Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neice v. State of Arkansas et al
as 2:2024cv02014
Plaintiff:
Richard William Neice
Defendant:
State of Arkansas, John or Jane Doe Officers, John or Jane Doe District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. Poole et al
as 4:2023cv04096
Plaintiff:
Justin Richard Haywood
Defendant:
Detective Jeremy Poole, Sgt. Tony Hanning and Sergeant Eleely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gault et al
as 5:2023cv05170
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Richard Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff Nick Gault and Sergeant Emily Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
