Cases 11 - 20 of 119
Betty's Best, Inc. v. Yuyao Aggpo Electronic Technology Co. LTD, et al
as 2:2022cv09096
Plaintiff:
Betty's Best, Inc.
Defendant:
Yuyao Aggpo Electronic Technology Co. LTD, et al
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Board of Trustees of the Construction Teamsters Security Fund for Southern California et al. v. Jorge Soto
as 2:2022cv08528
Petitioner:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION TEAMSTERS SECURITY FUND FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION TEAMSTERS APPRENTICESHIP FUND FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; et al.
Defendant:
JORGE SOTO, an individual and doing business as J. SOTO TRUCKING and Jorge Soto an individual doing business as J. Soto Trucking
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Construction Teamsters Security Fund for Southern California, Board of Trustees of the Construction Teamsters Apprenticeship Fund for Southern California, Board of Trustees of the Construction Teamsters Training and Upgrading Fund for Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Hasan Mustafa v. Superior Court of California County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2022cv02027
Petitioner:
Hasan Mustafa
Respondent:
Superior Court of California County of San Bernardino Fontana Courthouse
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Assocation, Superior Court of California County of San Bernardino and San Bernardino County Sherriffs Department
Interested Party:
San Bernardino County Sherriff's Department, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Robert McClelland v. SE Pipeline Construction Company
as 2:2022cv05172
Petitioner:
Robert McClelland, et al. and S E Pipeline Construction Company
Plaintiff:
Robert McClelland
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Danmark Music Group, Ltd., et al. v. Symphonic Distribution, Inc.,
as 2:2022cv00171
Plaintiff:
Danmark Music Group, Ltd., a UK private limited company, et al., Danmark Music Group, Ltd., Spanra APS and others
Defendant:
Symphonic Distribution, Inc., a Delaware corporation and Symphonic Distribution, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Vida Skin Care, Inc., et al. v. Sentinel Insurance Company Ltd., et al
as 2:2021cv07997
Plaintiff:
VIDA SKIN CARE, INC., a California Corporation, et al., Vida Skin Care, Inc., Sarine Marie Inc and others
Defendant:
SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., a Connecticut corporation, Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. 241,634.03 in funds from City National Bank account ending in X2325 et al
as 2:2021cv04404
Defendant:
$241,634.03 IN FUNDS FROM CITY NATIONAL BANK ACCOUNT ENDING IN X2325, ET AL.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
Deluxe Media, Inc. v. Broadband iTV, Inc.
as 2:2021mc00958
Respondent:
Broadband iTV, Inc.
Petitioner:
Deluxe Media, Inc.
In Re:
Underlying Action: Broadband iTV, Inc., v. AT&T Services Inc., et al
Board of Trustees of The Construction Teamsters Security Fund for Southern California et al v. Hammer Down Transportation, Inc.
as 2:2021cv03069
Defendant:
HAMMER DOWN TRANSPORTATION, INC., a suspended California corporation, and Hammer Down Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION TEAMSTERS SECURITY FUND FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION TEAMSTERS APPRENTICESHIP FUND FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; et al., Board of Trustees of the Construction Teamsters Security Fund for Southern California, Board of Trustees of the Teamsters Contract Compliance Trust Fund for Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Breana Prototype Daugherty v. Sean Famoso, et al
as 2:2021cv00488
Defendant:
LVRN et. al., Love Renaissance, Sean Famoso and others
Plaintiff:
BREANNA DAUGHERTY and Breana Prototype Daugherty
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
