Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Bill Blair v. State of California et al
as 2:2013cv06508
Plaintiff:
Bill Blair
Defendant:
Edmund Brown, Edmund Brown, California Department of Corrections and others
Tran v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 8:2013cv01340
Defendant:
Administrative Office of the Courts, Board of Behavioral Sciences, Tracey Pho Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Tran
Tran v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 8:2013cv00855
Defendant:
Administrative Office of the Courts, Board of Behavioral Sciences, Tracey Pho Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Tran
Kenney v. Japan et al
as 2:2011cv05341
Defendant:
AIA, AIG, AT and T and others
Plaintiff:
John B Kenney
Kyoto Young Womens Academy:
Kyoto Jyosei Gakuin
John B Kenney v. Japan et al
as 2:2011cv00630
Defendant:
AIA, AIG, AT and T and others
Plaintiff:
John B Kenney
Naji Awdat Hamdan et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2010cv06149
Plaintiff:
ACLU of Southern California, Naji Jawdat Hamdan and Hossam Hemdan
Defendant:
Bureau of Customs & Border Protection, Defense Intelligence Agency, Defense Office of Freedom of Information and others
Glen Broemer v. George Bush et al
as 2:2010cv05193
Plaintiff:
Glen Broemer
Defendant:
George Bush, Central Intelligence Agency, Dick Cheney and others
H Ray Lahr v. Natl Trans Safety Bd, et al
as 2:2003cv08023
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency and National Transportation Safety Board
Plaintiff:
H Ray Lahr
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Robert Michael Lovelace v. National Security Agency
as 2:2009cv00127
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Lovelace
Defendant:
National Security Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Glen Broemer v. United States
as 2:2003cv09097
Plaintiff:
Glen Broemer
Defendant:
United States of America, George Tenet, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
