Cases 1 - 10 of 646
Eugene William Hillman v. Warden
as 5:2024cv01175
Petitioner:
Eugene William Hillman
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Eugene Bowermaster v. Corporal Luis et al
as 2:2024cv04832
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Bowermaster
Defendant:
Corparal Luis and Deputy Navarette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee Michael Thompson v. Luna Innovations Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv04068
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Thompson
Defendant:
Luna Innovations Incorporated, Scott A. Graeff, Eugene J. Nestro and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Curtis Eugene Jung v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Curtis Eugene Jung
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Ronald Eugene James v. Mattel et al
as 2:2024cv03184
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
Mattel, Stacey Renee Carson James, Carl Tenbrink and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jamaal Rasheed James Sr. v. Eugene Clairborne et al
as 5:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Rasheed James Sr.
Defendant:
Eugene Clairborne, CACI Incorporated and Unknown Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Eyad Karzoun v. Luna Innovations Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv02630
Plaintiff:
Eyad Karzoun
Defendant:
Luna Innovations Incorporated, Scott A. Graeff, Eugene J. Nestro and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
