Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Tavo Simmons v. United States of America Probation Supervised Release et al
as 2:2024cv03467
Petitioner:
Tavo Simmons
Respondent:
United States of America Probation Supervised Release, Natasha Alexander Mingo and Chante Pagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Juan Pagan Jr. v. City of Fullerton et al
as 8:2023cv02492
Plaintiff:
Juan Pagan Jr.
Defendant:
City of Fullerton, Jaime Arroyo, Gharrett Wiltse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vincent Mercurio et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04997
Plaintiff:
Brittany Paul, Deana Redden, Vincent Mercurio and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Vidal Madera et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2022cv03770
Plaintiff:
Vidal Madera and Idali Pagan
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
JR Records LLC et al v. Carlos Efren Reyes Rosado et al
as 2:2021cv06850
Plaintiff:
JR Records LLC and Delroy Reid
Defendant:
Carlos Efren Reyes Rosado, Carbon Fiber Music, Inc., Carbon Fiber Music Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Doris Edelmira Pagan v. ACTS-Aviation Security, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06686
Defendant:
ACTS-Aviation Security, Inc., Gate Safe, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Doris Edelmira Pagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carmelo Pizzaro Pagan v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2020cv05058
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Carmelo Pizzaro Pagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Charles W. Windham v. Ronald Franklin et al
as 2:2016cv05888
Defendant:
Ascurate, H. T. Brown, M. A. Buechter and others
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Windham
Charles W. Windham v. Ronald Franklin et al
as 2:2016cv04375
Defendant:
Ascurate, H. T. Brown, M. A. Buechter and others
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Windham
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
