Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Justin Yamini v. RC ECommerce LLC et al
as 2:2023cv05966
Plaintiff:
Justin Yamini
Defendant:
RC ECommerce LLC and Double Ro LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Balboa Capital Corporation v. RC Lawncare Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
Balboa Capital Corporation
Defendant:
RC Lawncare Inc. and Rodney Lorenza Claytor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tracy L. Stewart v. Kathleen Allison
as 2:2022cv01402
Petitioner:
Tracy L. Stewart
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison, RC Johnson, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adam Ghadiri v. RC Window and Door et al
as 8:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Adam Ghadiri
Defendant:
RC WINDOW & DOOR, TOM CHEN, MEILONG INVESTMENT LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Joseph Brian Morales v. RC Johnson
as 2:2021cv09635
Petitioner:
Joseph Brian Morales
Respondent:
RC Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Keiron M. Elias v. Rosas et al
as 2:2021cv06052
Plaintiff:
Keiron M. Elias
Defendant:
Rosas, Lt. Martinez and RC Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alex McGinnis v. RC Johnson
as 2:2021cv05593
Plaintiff:
Alex McGinnis
Defendant:
RC Johnson, Tiggs Brown, J. Shby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RC JRV Trust Company, LLC v. Ken Mitchell et al
as 5:2021cv00364
Defendant:
Anthony Quezada, Jim Hammill, Howard Stratton and others
Plaintiff:
RC JRV Trust Company, LLC
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Allan Goodman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01154
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Tom Mark Franks v. RC Johnson et al
as 2:2021cv01262
Defendant:
J. Clark Kelso, RC Johnson and B. Ramos
Plaintiff:
Tom Mark Franks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
