Cases 91 - 100 of 111
Velasquez v. Donahue et al
as 2:2011cv01238
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Velasquez
Defendant:
Patrick R. Donahue, Maria Culloty and U.S. Postal Service
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graves v. Visek
as 2:2011cv00367
Plaintiff:
Peter Graves
Defendant:
Richard C. Visek, State Department (Civil Rights) Unit and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Graves v. Donahoe et al
as 2:2011cv00329
Plaintiff:
Peter Graves
Defendant:
Patrick R Donahoe, Tim Padden, USPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Portnoy et al v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv01680
Plaintiff:
Sergei Portnoy and Elena Portnoy
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitsitt v. Harris et al
as 2:2010cv01620
Plaintiff:
William J. Whitsitt
Defendant:
Pam Harris, Director Employment Development Department of California, Talbot Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pruitt et al v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2010cv00416
Plaintiff:
John Pruitt, Darryl Berg, Debra Berg and others
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, John McGinness, Santos Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009at00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 32 U.S.C. § 4323 Employment Rights of Uniformed Officers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 32 U.S.C. § 4323 Employment Rights of Uniformed Officers
Uptergrove et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv01800
Plaintiff:
Charles Wayne Uptergrove and Martha Gene Uptergrove
Defendant:
United States of America, McGregor Scott, G. Patrick Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
