Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Bernhard et al v. County of San Joaquin et al
as 2:2021cv00172
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin Sheriff's Department, County of San Joaquin, Danevia Rhone and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Thomas Bernhard, II and Stephanie Celeste Tejada-Otero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dunn v. Austin et al
as 2:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dunn
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, Frank Kendall, Gregory M. Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Doe v. City of Ridgecrest et al
as 1:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
City of Ridgecrest and Micah Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PS) Lewis et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv00423
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Lewis, BBYW Holdings LLC, Manumitted Indigenous American Heir Tribal Members and others
Defendant:
Scott Jones, Russell L. Hom, Lloyd Connley Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. City of Ridgecrest et al
as 1:2022at00128
Defendant:
City of Ridgecrest and Micah Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doe v. City of Ridgecrest et al
as 1:2022at00129
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
City of Ridgecrest and Micah Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dunn v. austin et al
as 2:2022at00165
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dunn
Defendant:
Lloyd austin, Frank Kendall, Gregory M. Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Howard v. Ranum, et al.
as 2:2017cv01807
Defendant:
Travis Monahan, Robert Ranum, Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Semaj Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tejada-Otero v. City of Tracy
as 2:2021cv01190
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Celeste Tejada-Otero and Lloyd Thomas Bernhard, II
Defendant:
City of Tracy, Fabiola Hernandez and Yordan Coss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
