Cases 91 - 100 of 412
Leyva, et al. v. City of Modesto, et al.
as 1:2020cv01369
Plaintiff:
Dulce Marie Belmonte, Alexis Leyva, Alexander Leyva and others
Defendant:
Involved Modesto Police Officers, City of Modesto, Modesto Police Department and others
Cross Defendant:
Antonio Gazo and Rodney Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Favor VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. Black Lives Matter et al
as 1:2020cv01165
Defendant:
Black Lives Matter, Michelle Obama, Amaro Records Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Alexander Favor VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Alexander v. Garza et al
as 2:2020cv01560
Defendant:
Perez, Bonilla, Garza and others
Plaintiff:
Julian J. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abbott et al v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv01061
Plaintiff:
Martine Stratton, Dominic Bakewell, Bryan Koch and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
(PS) Latorre v. Calaro et al
as 2:2020cv00886
Defendant:
Eve Doronio, Alexander Lagance, Yolanda Doronio Bueno and others
Plaintiff:
Ernanie Latorre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Favor VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. Gray et al
as 1:2020cv00577
Defendant:
Ettamae Gray, District Attorney, Brandon Favorllp Inc (1989) and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Alexander Favor VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Eaconomy, LLC v. Auvoria Prime LLC, et al.
as 1:2020cv00423
Defendant:
Kareem Maradona, Michael Manuel, Cameron Kerkar and others
Plaintiff:
Eaconomy, LLC
EACONOMY v. LETO et al
as 1:2020at00209
Defendant:
KAREEM MARADONA, MICHAEL MANUEL, CAMERON KERKAR and others
Plaintiff:
EACONOMY
(PC)Royal v. Ierokomos
as 2:2020cv00218
Plaintiff:
Freddie Lamont Royal
Defendant:
Alexander Ierokomos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Sanders v. Marshall
as 1:2020cv00002
Petitioner:
Troy Alexander Sanders
Respondent:
G. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
