Cases 11 - 20 of 71
Huerta v. Traquina, et al
as 2:2011cv00545
Plaintiff:
Heber Huerta
Defendant:
A. Traquina, T. Rallos, J. Rohrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Sayre et al
as 2:2010cv03216
Plaintiff:
Mailliard L. King
Defendant:
M. C. Sayre, Cheryl Malo-Clines and A.C. Traquina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartholomew v. Traquina et al
as 2:2010cv03145
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bartholomew
Defendant:
Alvaro C. Traquina, Burnadette Collejo, Yang Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reece v. Traquina
as 2:2010cv02949
Plaintiff:
Charles G. Reece
Defendant:
Alvaro C. Traquina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jauregui v. Cate et al
as 2:2010cv02283
Plaintiff:
Jorge Robles Jauregui
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, D. K. Sisto, Doctor's Hospital- Manteca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Traquina et al
as 2:2010cv01292
Plaintiff:
Mario A. Williams
Defendant:
Alvaro C. Traquina, Yuen Chen and K. Win
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ogo, et al v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2010cv00513
Plaintiff:
J. Ogo, R. Haenggi, R. T. Scott and others
Defendant:
Rojo, D. K. Sisto, Alvaro Traquina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFarland et al v. Bryant et al
as 2:2010at00257
Plaintiff:
Ian McFarland, Anthony Brown, Alfred Powell and others
Defendant:
Rodney Alton Bryant, D. K. Sisto, Alvaro Traquina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ogo et al v. Rojo et al
as 2:2010at00260
Plaintiff:
J Ogo, Ryan Scott Haenggi, R L Scott and others
Defendant:
Rojo, D. K. Sisto, Alvaro Traquina and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Blasingame, et al v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2010cv00514
Plaintiff:
Ralph Blasingame, Anthony Miliotti, Brian Tomasello and others
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, Alvaro Traquina, Tesie R. Rallos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
