Cases 11 - 20 of 40
(PC) Mitchell v. CDCR, et al
as 2:2020cv00831
Plaintiff:
Mia Rose Mitchell and Mia Rosati
Defendant:
Joseph Bick, Ralph M. Diaz, Jeffrey Carrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. CDCR, et al
as 2:2020at00401
Plaintiff:
Mia Rose Mitchell and Mia Rosati
Defendant:
Joseph Bick, Ralph M. Diaz, Jeffrey Carrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Martin v. Fox et al
as 2:2019cv02075
Defendant:
Joseph Bick, J. Lewis, Michele Ditomas and others
Plaintiff:
O.Z. Martin and O. Z. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ray v. Petras et al
as 2:2019cv01865
Defendant:
Joseph Bick, Ognjen Petras and Westley McAllister
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Reed v. Fox et al
as 2:2019cv00275
Defendant:
David M. Mathis, Hank Blank, San Joaquin General Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Windham v. Wofford et al
as 2:2018cv02656
Plaintiff:
Samuel Windham, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Shelling, Joseph Bick, J. Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Anderson v. California Medical Facility et al
as 2:2018cv02314
Defendant:
California Medical Facility and Joseph Bick
Plaintiff:
Julius Anderson and Julius Carter Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canfield v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2018cv01092
Plaintiff:
Donald Canfield
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Narinder Saukhla, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Healy v. Martel et al
as 2:2017cv01671
Plaintiff:
Jeff Healy
Defendant:
Marty Martel, Brian Duffy, Joseph Bicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Putney v. Fox et al
as 2:2017cv01507
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Putney
Defendant:
Robert Fox, Joseph Bick and Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
