Cases 11 - 20 of 151
(PC) Casity v. Son et al
as 2:2022cv01983
Plaintiff:
Richard Casity and Richard D. Casity
Defendant:
Monivirin Son, Amador County Sheriff Department, Todd Riebe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(SS) Macias v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01283
Plaintiff:
Lorena Macias
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(PS)DeVan Daniel v. Clayborne et al
as 2:2022cv01350
Plaintiff:
Melvin DeVan Daniel
Defendant:
Robert Clayborne, Jared Macias, Nathan Thalen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Macias v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2022cv01166
Plaintiff:
Teofilo Macias
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Harper v. Collins et al
as 2:2022at00435
Plaintiff:
Jason S. Harper
Defendant:
J. Collins, D. Williams, J. Cisneros-Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Kidwell v. Collins, et al
as 2:2022cv00738
Plaintiff:
Jason S. Harper, Sequoyah Deserthawk Kidwell and Jason Scott Harper
Defendant:
Jason Collins, Donna Williams, Jose Cisneros Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Mwasi v. Blanchard et al
as 1:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
King Mwasi
Defendant:
T. Blanchard, Huu Nguyen, Urbano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Davis v. Pena et al
as 1:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Cornell Davis
Defendant:
J. Pena, E. Hernandez, J. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC)Macias v. USA (2:15-cr-00125-KJM )
as 2:2022cv00080
Petitioner:
Benjamin Macias
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Macias v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv01028
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Lorena Macias
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
