Cases 11 - 20 of 103
Castillo v. Geisser et al
as 2:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
Rudy R Castillo and Rudy R. Castillo
Defendant:
Mick Geisser, Maris Goldsborough, Gabriel Hollingshead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Castillo v. Geisser et al
as 2:2022at00344
Plaintiff:
Rudy R Castillo
Defendant:
Mick Geisser, MARIS GOLDSBOROUGH, Gabriel Hollingshead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
(PS) Shao v. Roberts, et al.
as 2:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Yi Tai Shao and Linda Shao
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. SHAO et al
as 2:2022at00196
Defendant:
Yi Tai SHAO, John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PC) Jaramillo v. Burnes et al
as 1:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Rudie Anthony Jaramillo
Defendant:
Joseph Burnes, Alfonso Garcia, A. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jaramillo v. Burnes et al
as 2:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Rudie Jaramillo and Rudie Anthony Jaramillo
Defendant:
Joseph Burnes, Alfonso Garcia, A. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jaramillo v. Tappan et al
as 2:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Rudie A. Jaramillo and Rudie Anthony Jaramillo
Defendant:
T. Tappan, R. Ehlers, Faye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(SS) Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01731
Plaintiff:
Rudy Shermon Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
ESQUIVIL v. HERNANDEZ et al
as 1:2021at00701
Defendant:
JEFFREY HERNANDEZ, RUDY ALVARA and HUNTER LARIOS
Plaintiff:
DAVID ESQUIVIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2021at00700
Defendant:
Jeffrey Hernandez, Alvara Rudy and Larios Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
