Cases 11 - 20 of 347
(PC) Jacques v. Steffenmiser et al
as 2:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jacques
Defendant:
Steffenmiser, C. Elston, J. Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Smith v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2023cv00007
Petitioner:
Kenneth Walter Louis Smith
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Windham v. Pike et al
as 2:2022cv02007
Plaintiff:
Charles Windham
Defendant:
Michael Pike, Matthew Swett, Donald Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamon v. McTaggart et al
as 2:2022at01131
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
K. McTaggart, D. Laughlin, J. Filippello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lamon v. McTaggart et al
as 1:2022cv01421
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
K. McTaggart, D. Laughlin, J. Filippello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dunigan v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01713
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dunigan
Defendant:
Raybon C. Johnson, C.S.P. LA County, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Reid v. Nash et al
as 1:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Reid
Defendant:
CMO Jason Nash, Dr. K., Barry Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oba v. Larsen et al
as 1:2022at00231
Plaintiff:
Nancy M. Oba and Mark T. Oba
Defendant:
Steve Larsen, Mac Samuels, Stan Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Oba et al v. Larsen et al
as 1:2022cv00395
Plaintiff:
Nancy M. Oba and Mark T. Oba
Defendant:
Steve Larsen, Mac Samuels, Stan Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
(HC) Cole v. Cates
as 2:2022cv00198
Petitioner:
Walter Lee Cole
Respondent:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
