Cases 21 - 30 of 1,515
(PC) Jacques v. Jung et al
as 2:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Jacques
Defendant:
Jung, B. Jones and Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jones, Jr. v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Warden Jones, Officer J. Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jones v. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Warden Jones, Officer J. Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) USA v. Approx. $21,400.00 in U.S. Currency
as 2:2024mc00042
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $21,400.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Adriana Jones
(PC) Harris v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris
Defendant:
S Rodriguez, Anya, M. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) USA v. Approx. $20,010.00 in U.S. Currency
as 2:2024mc00041
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $20,010.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Adriana Jones
(PC) Valera v. Chavez et al
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Joel Valera
Defendant:
D. Chavez, M. Stenner, A. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jones v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Silas Jones
Defendant:
City of Sacramento and County of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) USA v. Approx $34,600.00 in U.S. Currency
as 2:2024mc00015
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $34,600.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Alfred Andrews and Adriana Jones
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
