Cases 21 - 30 of 2,074
(PS) Smith v. Home Depot
as 2:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
Home Depot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Smith v. Home Depot
as 2:2024at00516
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
Home Depot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Smith v. Davis
as 1:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Candace Smith
Defendant:
Kathy Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant:
The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
(PC) Howard v. Rios et al
as 1:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Karlis Ruben Augustus Howard
Defendant:
J. Rios, Steve Smith, City of Coalinga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
S.L. v. County of Trinity et al
as 2:2024at00460
Plaintiff:
S. L.
Defendant:
County of Trinity, Sheriff Tim Saxon, Corporal Ron Whitman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Planet Fitness et al
as 1:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Candace Smith
Defendant:
Planet Fitness, Private Security Company, Brianna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Murphy v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Cordoza
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Candace Smith
Defendant:
Alexa Cordoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
