Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Polk v. United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv01369
Plaintiff:
Raymond Polk
Defendant:
United States of America , Bureau of Prisons , USP Atwater and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lawson v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2014cv00576
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jerome Lawson
Defendant:
Department of Justice , Cellmate and USP Atwater Staff Members
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lawson v. Department of Justice et al
as 2:2014cv00912
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jerome Lawson
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Cellmate and USP Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Messer v. USP Atwater Facilities Department et al
as 1:2013cv01032
Plaintiff:
Cecil Messer
Defendant:
USP Atwater Facilities Department, Mr. Mattson, Day and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daly v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden USP, Atwater
as 1:2013cv00958
Petitioner:
Joshua Robert Daly
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden USP, Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Muse v. USP Atwater, CA Staff Members
as 1:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
Earl Muse
Defendant:
USP Atwater Staff , Mukgan , Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burgess v. F.B.O.P. et al
as 1:2012cv01817
Plaintiff:
Corey Burgess
Defendant:
F.B.O.P. , Department of Justice , DSCC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00779
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee
Defendant:
United States of America, USP Atwater, J. Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Way v. 20 Unknown Employees of Federal Bureau of Prisons USP-Atwater, California
as 1:2012cv00357
Plaintiff:
Long Way
Defendant:
20 Unknown Employees of Federal Bureau of Prisons USP-Atwater, California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graves v. Donahoe et al
as 2:2011cv00329
Plaintiff:
Peter Graves
Defendant:
Patrick R Donahoe, Tim Padden, USPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
