Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Lemire et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2008at00228
Plaintiff:
Sherie Lemire, Estate, Gerard Charles St. Jovite and others
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Arnold Schwartzenegger, James E. Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Lemire et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2008cv00455
Plaintiff:
Sherie Lemire
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Arnold Schwartzenegger, James E. Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Law v. Aruther, et al
as 2:2008cv00291
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gilbert Law
Defendant:
Aruther, Cono, Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fryman v. Traquina et al
as 2:2007cv02636
Plaintiff:
Steven Fryman
Defendant:
A. Traquina and A. Noriega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2007cv01871
Plaintiff:
Nyles Lawayne Watson
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, Traquina, Richard Tan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Anti, et al
as 2:2007cv01675
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Smith
Defendant:
- Anti, J. Tilton, Gosek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Sisto, et al.
as 2:2007cv01499
Plaintiff:
Cedrick A. Walker
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woolf v. Sisto et al
as 2:2007cv01494
Plaintiff:
Perry Woolf
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2007cv01497
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee White
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2007cv01495
Plaintiff:
George Harmon
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
