Cases 61 - 70 of 94
Allen v. Tilton
as 2:2007cv02273
Plaintiff:
Danny Paul Allen
Defendant:
James E. Tilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camp v. Tilton et al
as 2:2007cv02257
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Camp
Defendant:
James E. Tilton and Jeanne Woodford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2007cv02164
Plaintiff:
Gary Steven Bowman
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger and James E. Tilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campostrini v. Tilton et al
as 2:2007cv02132
Petitioner:
Bruno Campostrini
Respondent:
James E. Tilton and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowman v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2007cv02118
Plaintiff:
Gary Steven Bowman
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, James E. Tilton and Sue Orson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. State of California, et al
as 1:2007cv01363
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Mule Creek State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Brooks, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgande v. Tilton et al
as 2:2007cv01824
Petitioner:
Begoia Morgande
Respondent:
James E. Tilton and D. K. Sisto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Delaney v. Tilton et al
as 1:2007cv01219
Plaintiff:
Ishmael Delaney
Defendant:
James E. Tilton, James A. Yates and Angel Ramirez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duran v. Macias-Price et al
as 1:2007cv01209
Plaintiff:
John Duran
Defendant:
Lori Macias-Price, Brandis B. McGriff, Michele Tew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v Hickman, et al
as 2:2007cv01466
Plaintiff:
Thelma Anderson
Defendant:
Roderick Q. Hickman, James E. Tilton, Tom Felker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
