Cases 1 - 10 of 31
GS Holistic, LLC v. Crows Landing Smoke Shop, Inc d/b/a 99 Plus Outlet & Smokeshop et al
as 1:2022at00890
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Crows Landing Smoke Shop, Inc d/b/a 99 Plus Outlet & Smokeshop and Basma Muthana
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
GS Holistic, LLC v. Crows Landing Smoke Shop, Inc
as 1:2022cv01454
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Crows Landing Smoke Shop, Inc Doing business as 99 Plus Outlet & Smokeshop and Basma Muthana
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
(PC) West v. Cortez, et al.
as 2:2022cv01897
Plaintiff:
Jerry West, Jr.
Defendant:
Cortez, Crow, A/W and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) West v. Cortez et al
as 1:2022cv01341
Plaintiff:
Jerry West, Jr.
Defendant:
Cortez, Crow, A/W and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Butler v. Kelso et al
as 2:2022cv01301
Plaintiff:
Darius Butler
Defendant:
J. Clark Kelso, Richard Kirkland, Lisa Heintz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Crow v. LKQ Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00577
Defendant:
Joe Bilbao, LKQ Corporation, Amanda Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Christine Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crow v. LKQ Corporation et al
as 1:2021at00404
Defendant:
Joe Bilbao, LKQ Corporation, Amanda Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Christine Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PC) Bryant v. Kibler et al
as 1:2021cv00033
Defendant:
Robert Peery, Crother, Brian Kibler and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bryant v. Kibler et al
as 2:2021cv00060
Defendant:
Robert Peery, Crother, Brian Kibler and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowe v. Berryhill
as 2:2019at00330
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Crowe
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
