Cases 1 - 10 of 46
(PC) Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 2:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Phillip Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Randolph Wilson, Michael Gonzalez, Randy Barcena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amos v. Simmons et al
as 2:2021at00229
Defendant:
Zachary Simmons and County of San Joaquin
Plaintiff:
Courtney Amos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amos v. Simmons et al
as 2:2021cv00470
Defendant:
Zachary Simmons and County of San Joaquin
Plaintiff:
Courtney Amos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fowler et al v. FAF, Inc. et al
as 2:2021at00090
Plaintiff:
Dennis Fowler and Shannon Fowler
Defendant:
Iris Bennett, Rolling With Amos Trucking, LLC and FAF, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fowler et al v. FAF, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00181
Plaintiff:
Dennis Fowler and Shannon Fowler
Defendant:
Iris Bennett, Rolling With Amos Trucking, LLC and FAF, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PS) Pearson v. Icanotes-EHR et al
as 2:2020cv01720
Defendant:
Sutter Urgent Care, Amazing Charts-EHR, Sutter Center for Psychiartry and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Todd v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2020cv01442
Defendant:
Sacramento County, Britton, B. Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Trevor Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels et al v. County of Butte et al
as 2:2020cv00445
Plaintiff:
Ariele Rost Amo, Susan Adell Daniels, Cannon Hugh Daniels and others
Defendant:
Oroville Hospital, Butte County Sheriff's Department, County of Sacramento and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Gaon v. Lau et al
as 1:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Jane Chern, Stanlake Ye, Ken Chaffee and others
Plaintiff:
Amos Gaon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayre et al v. Forward Air, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02473
Plaintiff:
Sierra Hayre, F. H. and M. H.
Defendant:
Rolling with Amos Trucking, LLC, Iris Bennett, FAF Tranport, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
