Cases 1 - 10 of 33
(PC) Booth v. Pouge, et al.
as 1:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Booth
Defendant:
Tyson Pouge, Lopez, Alva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
NVME Group, Inc. v. Halverson, et al.,
as 2:2023cv01453
Plaintiff:
The NVME Group, Inc. a California Corporation Doing business as RGI Spray Booth and NVME Group, Inc. a California Corporation Doing business as RGI Spray Booth
Defendant:
Michael Halverson, Fast Rack Equipment, LLC, Stacey Mischker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
(PC) Booth v. Santos
as 2:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Booth
Defendant:
Dawn Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Windham v. Pike et al
as 2:2022cv02007
Plaintiff:
Charles Windham
Defendant:
Michael Pike, Matthew Swett, Donald Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Windham v. Covello et al
as 2:2022cv01931
Plaintiff:
Charles Windham
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Bryan Holmes, Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Booth v. Campbell et al
as 1:2021cv00123
Defendant:
Tolbert Campbell and Karl Hancock
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Booth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Booth v. Newsom
as 2:2020cv01562
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Booth
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Booth v. Carrol
as 1:2020cv01067
Defendant:
L. Carrol
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Booth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Booth v. Williams College et al
as 2:2020cv00265
Defendant:
Williams College and Standard Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Booth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
