Cases 1 - 10 of 14
(PC) Harper v. Cisneros et al
as 1:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
Jason Harper and Jason Scott Harper
Defendant:
Theresa Cisneros, Anthony Baer, Joseph Brainard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
as 1:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott Harper
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison, Theresa Cisneros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hackworth v. Arevalos et al
as 1:2019cv01362
Defendant:
E. Arevalos, J. Brainard, D. Stohl and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Hackworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hunt v. Diaz et al
as 2:2019cv00543
Plaintiff:
Mark Hunt
Defendant:
D. Diaz, S. Hemenway, A. Velasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Rayford v. Sherman et al
as 1:2019cv00225
Defendant:
S. Magnia, K. Rening, A. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Rayford v. Sherman et al
as 2:2019cv00246
Defendant:
S. Magnia, K. Rening, A. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Cheatham v. Wan et al
as 1:2019cv00135
Defendant:
Pratti, A. Shaw, J. Brainard and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Cheatham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brainard v. Provost et al
as 1:2011cv00737
Plaintiff:
William J. Brainard
Defendant:
Eleanor Provost, James A. Boscoe, Douglas C. Boyack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brainard v. Boyd et al
as 2:2011cv00851
Plaintiff:
William J. Brainard
Defendant:
Christopher W. Boyd, E. Miller, George Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brainard v. Provost et al
as 2:2011cv00850
Plaintiff:
William J. Brainard
Defendant:
Eleanor Provost, James A. Boscoe, Douglas C. Boyack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
