Cases 1 - 8 of 8
(PS) Oliver v. Placer County Superior Court et al
as 2:2020cv01203
Defendant:
Law Office of Charles Pacheco, Placer County Public Defender's Office, Shelly Leigh Wright and others
Plaintiff:
David Jerome Oliver, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
County of Kern et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv00557
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Kern, The People of the State of California, People of the State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Warfield v. California Attorney Generals Office et al
as 2:2017cv02544
Plaintiff:
Broderick James Warfield
Defendant:
California Attorney Generals Office, Solano County District Attorney, Fairfield Police Department & Dispatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kipp v. State of California Attorney General's Office
as 1:2012at00268
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Kipp
Defendant:
State of California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spohn v. Trinity County District Attorney's Office et al
as 2:2012cv00565
Plaintiff:
Paul Noah Spohn
Defendant:
Trinity County District Attorney's Office, Michael B Harper, Eric Heryford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Downs v. Sacramento District Attorney Office et al
as 2:2009cv01105
Plaintiff:
Gregory Downs
Defendant:
Sacramento District Attorney Office, California Attorney General's Office, Ronald W. Tochterman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrugia v. Lockyer et al
as 1:2008cv00053
Plaintiff:
Thomas Farrugia
Defendant:
Bill Lockyer, The California Attorney General's Office, Richard Lopes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Martinez v. CA Attorney General
as 2:2000cv01590
Plaintiff:
David Martinez
Defendant:
California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
