Cases 1 - 10 of 3,087
Slaughter v. City of Sacramento
as 2:2024cv01757
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Slaughter
Defendant:
City of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hursey v. City of Redding
as 2:2024cv01758
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hursey
Defendant:
City of Redding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nieto v. City of Visalia et al
as 1:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
Uriel Nieto
Defendant:
City of Visalia, Chief Jason Salazar, Antonio Matos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Young v. Renewal by Andersen, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01759
Plaintiff:
Brenda Young
Defendant:
Renewal By Andersen, LLC, Andersen Corporation and River City Window and Door, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Hursey v. City of Redding
as 2:2024at00782
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hursey
Defendant:
City of Redding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Renewal by Andersen, LLC et al
as 2:2024at00783
Plaintiff:
Brenda Young
Defendant:
Renewal By Andersen, LLC, Andersen Corporation and River City Window and Door, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Slaughter v. City of Sacramento
as 2:2024at00780
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Slaughter
Defendant:
City of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greathouse v. City of Fresno et al
as 1:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
James Greathouse
Defendant:
City of Fresno and Fresno Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Isaacs v. City of Susanville et al
as 2:2024cv01707
Plaintiff:
Michael Isaacs
Defendant:
City of Susanville, Jerrad Lopez, Michael Hoover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Gonzalez et al v. Yolo County et al
as 2:2024cv01683
Plaintiff:
Justin Gonzalez, Morgan Gonzalez, Linda Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Yolo County, City of Woodland, Sergio Pimental and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
