Cases 1 - 10 of 40
(HC) Rile v. County of Sacramento
as 2:2024cv00844
Petitioner:
James Edward Eloy Rile
Respondent:
County of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PS) Rile v. Land Home Financial Services Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
James Edward Eloy Rile
Defendant:
Land Home Financial Services Inc, MTC Financial Inc Dba Trustee Corps, Servicelink and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(SS) Bates v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01209
Plaintiff:
James Edward Bates, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(HC) Dailey v. State of California
as 1:2023cv00389
Petitioner:
James Edward Dailey
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Johnson v. Young et al
as 2:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
James Edward Johnson
Defendant:
Young and O'Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Taylor v. Ho et al
as 2:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
James Edward Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Ho, Fiji and Sacramento County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Lemoore PD et al
as 1:2021cv01275
Plaintiff:
James Edward Wallace
Defendant:
Lemoore PD and Acosta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Smith v. Shasta County Jail et al
as 2:2021cv00877
Defendant:
Dave Kent, Van Gerwin, Shasta County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
James Edward Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01631
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Cupp, et al v Brucker
as 2:2018cv02587
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cupp and Lawrence Haven
Defendant:
Jesse Brucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
