Cases 1 - 10 of 95
(HC) Allen v. Samuels, et al.
as 1:2023cv00503
Petitioner:
Clarence Allen
Respondent:
D. Samuels, California State Prison and the Attorney General of the State of California and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. Trump et al
as 1:2017cv01603
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Pierce
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, U.S. Government, Fresno Federal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01324
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Martello v. Lee et al
as 2:2017at00714
Plaintiff:
Jeannette Martello
Defendant:
Peter Lee, desi malone, katie marcellus and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
Dotson v. Harris
as 2:2017cv00874
Petitioner:
Charles A. Dotson
Respondent:
Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ali v. State of California et al
as 1:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Hussein Kietty Ali
Defendant:
State of California, Pat L. Vasquez and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dupree v. Harris
as 2:2016cv02872
Plaintiff:
Richard Jose Dupree, Jr
Defendant:
Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flynt et al v. Harris et al
as 2:2016cv02831
Plaintiff:
Larry C. Flynt , Haig Kelegian, Sr. and Haig T. Kelegian, Jr.
Defendant:
Kamala D. Harris , Wayne J. Quint, Jr. , Bureau of Gambling Control and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reed v. Arnold
as 2:2016cv02608
Petitioner:
Lawrence Reed, Jr.
Respondent:
Eric Arnold and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. The US Government and Its Officers as Federal Judges et al
as 1:2016cv01361
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Defendant:
The US Government and Its Officers as Federal Judges, Kamala D. Harris, The California Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
