Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Martinez et al v. City of Fresno et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Desiree Martinez and We Are Not Invisible
Defendant:
City of Fresno, Howard Lacy, David Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jones v. Pond et al
as 1:2023cv01489
Plaintiff:
Robin A. Jones
Defendant:
Rachel Pond, Pamela Ombudsperson, Mary Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at00892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
(PC) George v. Lopez et al
as 2:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Louis George, Jr.
Defendant:
A. Lopez, C. Lor, Eniola Oguntuase and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan et al v. City of Lodi, CA et al
as 2:2023cv00566
Plaintiff:
Shakir Khan, Umer Hayat, Adnan Bilal and others
Defendant:
City of Lodi, California, Mikey Hothi, The City Council of the City of Lodi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Doe v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2023at00286
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
City of Stockton, Oscar R. Villafan and Farhad Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
