Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Liles v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
KyrieAnna Liles
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, Jim Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker-Liles et al v. Garcia et al
as 2:2015cv00894
Plaintiff:
Ciarra Parker-Liles and Marquita Figures
Defendant:
Steven Garcia and Shane Raftery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivan Lee Matthews v. Liles et al
as 1:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lee Matthews
Defendant:
R. Liles, J. Sherrett and J. Cable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013at00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Harris v. Cate et al
as 1:2011cv01816
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Harris
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, F Gonzalez and D. Liles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andoh v. City of South Lake Tahoe et al
as 2:2010cv02053
Plaintiff:
John Andoh
Defendant:
City of South Lake Tahoe, South Lake Tahoe Police Department and Russell Liles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andoh v. City of South Lake Tahoe et al
as 2:2010at01122
Plaintiff:
John Andoh
Defendant:
City of South Lake Tahoe, South Lake Tahoe Police Department and Russell Liles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Comundoiwilla v. Liles
as 1:2010cv00845
Plaintiff:
Lamavis Anthown Comundoiwilla
Defendant:
R Liles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
East v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv01739
Plaintiff:
Ebone LeRoy East
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, California Correctional Institution, Ferdanan Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
