Cases 1 - 10 of 21
(PS) Rogers v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Kim Edward Rogers
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Keaton Riley, Jim Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
(PS) Rogers v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Kim Edward Rogers
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, City of Sacramento, Jim Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Lax v. Abode Services et al
as 2:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Crystal Lax and Dominique Lax
Defendant:
Abode Services, Life moves opportunity center, Brandon with Bill Wilson Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
(PC) Butler v. Day et al
as 1:2020cv01650
Defendant:
P. Perez, J. Backhurst, R. Day and others
Plaintiff:
Marques Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langley et al v. Guiding Hands School, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00635
Defendant:
Le'mon Thomas, Davis Joint Unified School District, Staranne Meyers and others
Plaintiff:
Cherilyn Caler, Robert Darrough, Michael Turelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Sekona v. Trujillo et al
as 1:2019cv00399
Defendant:
Raquel Trujillo, John Marques, Rigoberto Estrada and others
Plaintiff:
Etuate Sekona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Hill v. Newsom et al
as 2:2019cv00133
Respondent:
J. D. Lozano, Scott Kernan and Gavin Newsom
Petitioner:
Avery Marques Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marques Butler v. Brazelton et al
as 1:2014cv01220
Plaintiff:
Marques Butler
Defendant:
P.D. Brazelton, M.D. Dotson, R. Boozer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
