Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Martin v. Saint Agnes Medical Center
as 1:2024at00387
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Saint Agnes Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Martin v. Saint Agnes Medical Center
as 1:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Saint Agnes Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021at01027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
(HC) Martin v. Thompson
as 2:2019cv01492
Respondent:
Paul Thompson
Petitioner:
Michael Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martin v. California Teachers Association et al
as 2:2018at01190
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
California Teachers Association, Riverside City Teachers Association, National Education Associaton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. California Teachers Association et al
as 2:2018cv01951
Defendant:
California Teachers Association, National Education Associaton, Riverside Unified School District and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2016cv00338
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2016at00179
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin v. Medtronic, Inc., et al.
as 1:2015cv00994
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Neuromodulation and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations, Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
