Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Morrow v. Stay Winning Boutique, LLC
as 2:2023cv02167
Plaintiff:
Jamie Morrow
Defendant:
Stay Winning Boutique, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
(PS) Dearman v. Olivera et al
as 2:2022cv02158
Plaintiff:
Ryan Alan Dearman
Defendant:
Elizabeth Ufkes Olivera, Bradley Morrow, Joe Garofalo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Martinez v. Campbell et al
as 1:2022cv01549
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Martinez
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell, Ken Clark, E. McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baday v. County of Kings, et al.
as 1:2020cv00644
Plaintiff:
Karla Baday
Defendant:
Jeff J. Torres, Joshua R. Speer, Dean Morrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Howell v. Camargo et al
as 1:2019cv00266
Defendant:
D. Saucedo, C. Munoz, E. Cerda and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01724
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC et al v. Morrow et al
as 2:2018cv02970
Petitioner:
West Maui Resort Partners, L.P. and Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC
Respondent:
Ileana Morrow and John Morrow
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
DIAMOND RESORTS HAWAII COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT, LLC et al v. MORROW et al
as 2:2018at01714
Petitioner:
WEST MAUI RESORT PARTNERS, L.P. and DIAMOND RESORTS HAWAII COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Respondent:
ILEANA MORROW and JOHN MORROW
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Howard v. Ranum et al
as 2:2017at00904
Plaintiff:
Semaj Howard
Defendant:
Robert Ranum, Christopher Barney, Nathan Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
