Cases 1 - 10 of 55
(PC) Reeves v. Diesslin et al
as 2:2022cv02084
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Reeves
Defendant:
Diesslin, Lewis and Mejia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. City of Fairfield et al
as 2:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Danielle N. Houston
Defendant:
City of Fairfield, Jerriod Mack, Joshua Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. City of Fairfield et al
as 2:2022at00620
Plaintiff:
Danielle N. Houston
Defendant:
City of Fairfield, Jerriod Mack, Joshua Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. The People of the State of California et al
as 1:2022cv00532
Plaintiff:
Clifton Williams, Jr
Defendant:
The People of the State of California, County of Stanislaus, DAwna F. Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks et al v. Stockton Unified School District et al
as 2:2021at00479
Plaintiff:
Elinor E Banks, Keenan G Mancho, Artia S Taylor and others
Defendant:
Sonny Larkins, Stephanie Reeves, Brian Biederman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks et al v. Stockton Unified School District et al
as 2:2021cv00936
Plaintiff:
Keenan Mancho, Kyndal Mancho, Elinor Banks and others
Defendant:
Sonny Larkins, Stephanie Reeves, Brian Biederman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01084
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
(PC) Reeves v. Dougherty et al
as 1:2020cv00487
Defendant:
E. McDaniel and S. Dougherty
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(SS) Reeves v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00080
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Reeves
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
